Anti-Federalist :: essays research papers

Most Americans were very suspicious of political relation, but the Anti-Federalist was unfeignedly scrupleful of the government in general and strong interior(a) government. This mistrust was the basis of their opposition to the geological formation. They feared it had created a government the people could non control. many a(prenominal) distinguished Americans were Anti-Federalists. Leaders included George Mason and Elbridge Gerry. Both attended the Philadelphia draw but had refused to sign the constitution. The Anti-Federalist argued that the Constitution had many flaws. The estimation that it should fix been essential in meetings whose proceedings was open to the public. And it would undermine a republican form of government. It gave too much business office to the national government at the get down of the powers of state governments. It gave too much power to the executive branch of the national government at the expense of the other branches. It gave too much pow er because of the necessary and proper clause. It did not adequately separate the powers of the executive and legislative branches. In addition, it allowed the national government to keep an army during peacetime. And also it did not include a bill of rights. They feared that because of these flaws in the Constitution, the new national government would be a threat to their national rights. They also thought that the constitution had been developed by an elite and privileged group to create a national government for the purpose of serving its own selfish interest. They thought the only safe government that if it had a local and closely coupled with the will of the people. And controlled by the people, by such means as we have yearly elections and replacing peopled in key positions often.The Federalist knew that many members of relative and the state governments were against the new Constitution, largely because it reduced their powers. So the federalist decided not to ask the Congr ess or state governments to approve the Constitution, even though they were expected to do so. Today, now that the Constitution has worked successfully for 200 years, it would be easy to ignore the anti-federalist of 1787 and 1788 as an unimportant historical force, a order of no constructive reactionaries and cranks. Actually, the anti-federalist may well have represented the views of the legal age of the Americans, whose reasons for preferring the obsolete Articles of Confederation were firmly within the democratic tradition.Among the anti-federalist were fiery old patriot leaders who feared