custer :: essays research papers

The controversy of General Custer and the actions that culminated his fate and almost third hundred men under his command has long been discussed and debated by some(prenominal) historians as well as important military officials all onerous to conclude what happened at the Battle of unforesightful Bighorn. There require been boundless myths and legends of what occurred on that fateful day in American history, but in that location has yet to be a solid right answer. This answer is difficult to conclude for one reason, there were no survivors of the contend from Custers troops. This conduct to the many different sides of story that were mostly fabricated by newspapers and motives to remove their papers and books, with come on much care towards the accuracy of the troth and it events. The book, Custer and The Great contest trys to put into context the developing situations prior to and after the battle to get to the roots of these legends and myths to try and make sense o f them. The authors goal is not to come to a conclusion and a theory of his own, but to disregard the myths and legends of the past and in doing so bedevil some light on the controversy for people who may have thought otherwise. The author achieves this goal in a unique demeanor by writing chronologically but at the same cartridge holder writes about the major events of the developing controversy, sometimes overlapping in geezerhood but making smooth connections between similar the events. First, the author starts out by giving a background of The Battle of Little Bighorn. Describing the principal(prenominal) characters of the battle and the events leading up to the battle and then finally the battle itself in a broad context. Doing this gives the reader a foundation of what lies frontwards in the book. Secondly, the author describes the role of the press and its impact after the battle has concluded. The press can be looked upon as the main reason for the kindle myths and le gends that followed due to their unwillingness to find the facts and their motivation to sell their papers. Thirdly, the author attends to the huge debate that followed the battle a few years later, that was fueled by these myths and arose during this hostile time. The debate was between the critics who thought that Custer led his men into self-annihilation by disobeying orders and selfishly seeking the individual pride and glory that followed him throughout his military career up until his death at The Battle of Little Bighorn.