The Word of God Does Not to Turn Evil into Good Essay -- Religious Arg

The Word of God Does non to Turn Evil into Good Conscience is close totimes spoken of as the voice of God within. To many this seems a rather unsophisticated affaire to say. It may seem the sort of thing a non-intellectual theist competency casu wholey affirm, perhaps in a well-intentioned effort to boost conscientiousness in himself and others. But the idea that men shoot a sort of inner guiding light which is a reflection of the spirit of God is far from being simple-minded. True or false, it is a prefatorial concept with wide ramifications.For a theist, it is altogether natural to suppose that in some way the human moral sensitivity derives from God. The Bible starts pip with the story of Adam and Eve eating of the fruit of the tree of experience of good and dark. Whereupon their eyes were opened and they became as gods knowing good from evil (Genesis 35,7,22). Paul in Romans (214-15) speaks of a natural understanding (conscience, by nature, scripted on the hea rt) present in all men, which he assumes to be authoritative. just about Christian theologians (Calvinists excepted) have held that human moral aw arness reflects in some way and to some degree Gods own judgment of good and evil. We are said to be made in the image of God. Sophisticated philosophers such as Whitehead and Peirce have held that men live under the influent radiance of Gods beauty and goodness, men recognizing these values and being attracted to them. Even Plato and Aristotle have an understanding of these issues remarkably compatible with the statement that conscience is the voice of God. Atheists of head for the hills cannot accept the phrase in any but the most poetical sense, as Dewey permits use of the invent God in his book, A Common Faith... ...onscience. infra some circumstances I have a duty to accommodate a needle into my child.)So we see that in the end the whole morally compelling reason even to obey God is that, all things considered, we fee l a conscientious duty to do so. If Gods will were to whirl out to be in fundamental conflict with our sense of unspoiled and wrong, and we had no reason to suppose that we would ever find his apparent evil to be really good, then for what reason at all could a man justify the violation of his own integrity for the sake of a being with fundamentally different values? Nothing about the word God is magic to turn evil into good. Thus Abraham can exclusively be commended for what he decided to do if we suppose he snarl a conscien tious compulsion to do so, a compulsion that was either felt directly or resulted from his belief that Gods will would finally be revealed as good.