Food Inc Essay

The icon makes some really good points. The surmount point is that subsidized maize unnaturally lowers the cost of animal feed and high-fructose corn syrup. This creates a tax-subsidized economic incentive for stack to choose steady fare all over nutritious options. Scrapping farm subsidies including corn would be a great caprice (that the photographic film doesnt propose). It has a good department about how Monsanto is using intellectual blank space law to unfairly create a US soybean monopoly, suing sodbusters who never bought Monsanto spill and forcing them to capitulate beca riding habit of the sheer weight of intelligent bills.But the moving-picture show descends into sensationalism. For example, it takes a disturbing case of a kid named Kevin who died of E Coli inebriation after eating a hamburger. It traces the industrys response which is to use ammonia water to make sure that close to no E Coli survives and criticizes its solution man playing ominous musi c in the background along with unanswered cries of wound from Kevins mother. It fails to mention that (1) all E Coli dies when meat is cooked properly (2) using ammonia to kill E Coli is an ingenious idea thats very effective (3) the food with the greatest risk of E Coli poisoning is organic spinach.It doesnt mention how the tumultuous food industry eliminated the use of hydrogenated veggie oil, almost completely eliminating trans fat from fast food. It has a scene comparing the resources utilize by a free set about cow farmer who has about 20 cows versus an industrial slaughterhouse that processes thousands impuissance to mention that if the free range farmer produced cows on the same measure he would use 4x to 10x the resources for the same output. The impression takes an ill-advised stance against genetically modified food (google Norman Borlaugh).It makes several unsuccessful arguments (like arguing that our industrially-produced food is infected and resource- intensif ier and that we should even out more to eat organic which is rattling much more resource intensive and more likely to be grime by bacteria because of the use of low-d own as fertilizer instead of nitrates). The movie makes some interesting points. But the intact astronomical business bad social occasion is a completely useless locating that is a constant source of impatience to me personally.People and businesses have, do, will, and should act in their own best interests. The question is which policies should be created to incentivize rash outcomes? Regarding Monsanto, the problem isnt evil big business, its that the US should reform its legal system to act like the UKs where if you sue someone and lose and then you have to pay their legal fees. That would preclude Monsantos abuses of IP law (and would secure tort reform in medical malpractice).