Origins Of The Concept Of Self Essay Sample free essay sample

Literally. the construct of ego concerns itself with the fact that persons have a certain degree of acknowledgment of events and occurrences in their immediate environment. The footings himself. herself. myself. and many others really confine themselves to this construct of ego. I n definition therefore we can mention to this term as the entirety of all systems refering an person with certain sentiments and attitudes he or she upholds for personal being ( Purkey. 1988 ) . In his construct of uncertainty. Rene Descartes. a philosopher of the 17Thursdaycentury argued that if he thinks so he could be certain that he existed. Harmonizing to his rule of uncertainty. Descartes suggested that it was a critical part of developing enquiries about nature. Furthermore. he argued that he did non doubt that he doubted. By the bend of the 20Thursdaycentury. a psychologist by the name Sigmund Freud came up with his theory of personality in which he demonstrated that internal mental procedures determined to a big extent the development of the ‘self’ in an person. However. it was his girl Anna ( 1946 ) who came with a clear penetration of the theory of personality by depicting the development of self-importance. Self consistence was the 2nd thought brought up by Prescott Lecky ( 1945 ) who in his theory suggested that ego consistence was and is cardinal as a motivational force in an person. Shortly after the description of ego consistence. Raimy ( 1948 ) came up with legion steps of ego construct which he fundamentally applied in Sessionss of guidance. Harmonizing to Raimy. psychotherapeutics is merely but a procedure of changing the procedure of self perceptual experience of an person. [ 1 ] It has been by and large accepted that self construct as the most personal facet of our human nature is as a consequence of our day-to-day interaction with our natural environment including our societal interaction with others. These interactions with others were expounded on by the celebrated ‘looking glass theory’ in which. Charles Cooley ( 1902 ) reflected appraisals we imagine others hold of us. In his positions George Herbert Mead extended this thought that self construct reflects the positions of other individuals by suggesting that the ego comes from following as our ain the orientations other people have towards us. As times goes we develop the impression of how other behave towards us. ( Ruch. 1975 ) . [ 2 ] Harmonizing to William James. this societal ego is merely one of the three chief constituents of ego. The other two are the stuff ego and the religious ego. We realize that the our ego construct is non a unitary entity. this means that we carry about as many societal egos as there are people who recognize us and ever keep our image in their head. What’s the deduction behind this? Here we merely intend that we may stop up enduring a lack of ego by missing a acknowledgment of others or by even acknowledging that the important image that the society clasp of us is a gross outing one and something wholly negative. ( Ruch. 1975 ) . An employee who is told by his employer that he has of all time known him as a lazy employee will most surely suffer from the ulterior experience. An exclusion can non be a pupil who is told by her female parent that she ever found her drilling. when she had ever thought that the female parent the female parent had ever taken her as a serious kid w henever she around her. ( Weed. 1986 ) . [ 3 ] In add-on to the ego development brought out as a consequence of assessments from other persons in the society. our construct of self construct comes from labeling with trait names the behaviour form we have of all time observed our egos engage in often or intensively. Furthermore. we sort of develop a hole of ourselves by virtuousness of societal comparing procedures. In this instance we try to develop the rightness of our thoughts. the quality of our of our sentiments. the rightness of our emotions. and the extent of our ability by comparing them with the behaviour of others. Once we develop some ego construct we tend to bias the information coming both from our environment and memory to be consistent with that image. Once once more the deduction behind this is that one time we begin believing extremely of ourselves and have positive ego regard. negative feedback is rid or treated as an account of regulation. On the other manus. once we develop low ego regard. positive feedba ck does small to alter it. This because the negative feedback is taken as an inconsistent exclusion. whereas any failure or bad experience is readily accommodated as expected grounds. It is baronial to observe that our ego construct non merely our relation with others but our sense of liberty ( because low esteem people are by and large conforming than are highs ) . the ends we aspire to and possibly the most of import. the quality of our private emotional life. PHILOSOPHICAL PERSPECTIVE OF THE SELF CONCEPT: [ 4 ] Philosophically. the term ego can be described as an entity made up of those indispensable features doing a human being distinguishable from every other being. Furthermore. it describes an thought of a complete entity which is regarded as the beginning of one’s consciousness. Therefore the ego is all about the discernible features of an single doing the ego as an agent through which duty for idea and individual’s actions get attributions. Therefore. the foregoing account of ego can merely intend that the ego can be thought of as a substance which takes through a span of clip and that the ideas and activities go oning at different spans are attributed to the ego. The methodological jobs experienced in the survey of the construct of ego normally affect the head and the consciousness. The construct of ego besides involves the thoughts of self- consciousness which involves the idea that one understands his or her being where a being is an single. life as a separate en tity from others with a complete separate head. At the minute of self consciousness people know themselves as existences. The description can depict self construct. in respect to their ain being. as a conceptual or mental consciousness. Philosophically. a being poses constituents attributed to psychological. physical and societal facets. [ 5 ] To convey a close relationship between psychological science and doctrine every bit far as the construct of ego is concerned ; we study the thought of head. We realize that psychological science and doctrine of the head are connected but the later is non the former. The difference comes in when we approximately consider psychological science as the survey of head and doctrine of head as endeavoring to understand the head by transporting out a series of probes about the head and the enigma behind its operation. The construct of ego comes in because we perceive ourselves as individuals and that we are rational existences by virtuousness of being intelligent. that is. an object in emanation of head which makes it possible for it to believe and be able to experience. Therefore. in understanding the enigma behind the head we in place to understanding ourselves. and even the enigma of what it is to be a individual or a human being. SELF CONCEPT IS A Solution TO THE FOLLOWING PROBLEMS: [ 6 ] Neurosis: – This occurs when an single feels threatened by life jeopardies and inadequate to the undertaking of get bying up with them. In this instance the ordinary self-importance defenses we all use are non equal. With clip such a individual may stop und up trusting overly on one or more neurotic defence forms. These forms have in common the hunt for alleviation from anxiousness. Thus they are characterized by an absence of joy in life and by actions aimed at decreasing hurting instead than positive achievement or the constructive solution of objectively existent jobs. In kernel an person is driven off from the universe of world and the feeling of ego being. Neurosis are viewed as supplying impermanent solution to the existent job that many people cleaving on them urgently despite the fact that they do non work out their existent job and may even decline them. They therefore self get the better ofing in the long tally. With more realistic perceptual experience there w ill be no demand for this feeling of loss of joy or tortured preoccupation with concerns or menaces. A normal single maps as an organized whole and trades with defeats more efficaciously. [ 7 ] Shyness: – This psychological trait can be said to be an consciousness of one’s inability to take societal action when one both wants to and cognize how to set about such programmes. It is hence a subjective province influenced by the label one attaches to a given set of reaction. Shyness is accompanied by a great trade of isolation from the societal environment. Because of the feelings of insufficiency one tends to free from the common action of the multitudes. Excessive rough self-evaluations arise in portion from ignorance about the expectedness of such societal anxiousness and besides deficiency of realistic criterions against which to judge one’s societal behaviour ( Zimbardo. 1980 ) . The thought of ego construct is of import here because the feeling of ego thrusts an single towards the feeling of ego assurance. [ 8 ] Michiavalism: – This trait in the ego is regarded as the grade to which persons are manipulative and matter-of-fact. In the graduated tables that have been developed to mensurate michiavalism among the members of the population. on one terminal is the High Machs. people with comparative criterions of behaviour. and at the other terminal. those who are Machs and have absolute criterions. Machiavellians are symbolized by emotional distance and are guided by what they know rationally. instead emotionally. Self construct here is explained in the behaviours of the High Machs who embrace the ego assurance in themselves. ( Zimbardo. 1980 ) . SELF CONCEPT IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING PROBLEMS: The construct of ego is most associated with the feeding jobs. particularly among the striplings in any given population. From many researches that have so far been conducted it has been argued that Eating Attitude Test ( EAT ) measured jobs of eating by analyzing diet. and Bulimia –food preoccupation. From these findings it was concluded that misss low across the graduated table were more frequently than non characterized by high ego esteem which was accompanied high ego perceptual experience attitude. On the other manus. low ego regard and unstable ego perceptual experience was recorded in misss high on all eat graduated tables. For older members of the community it was found out that Bulimic and dieting inclinations were common. Decision: [ 9 ] When speaking on the rule of the self-concept we realize people in their day-to-day life have formed theories about themselves –recognizing egos as functional persons. It is hence possible to incorporate the phenomologists’ thoughts about the nature of ego –concept. We recognize this construct as a system of constructs organized in a hierarchy and that it is contained in a broader system of constructs. Furthermore. there several empirical egos contained within a system of whole and this include material ego. religious ego and even the physical and the organic structure ego. As we had noted earlier on. the ego construct comes from experience. particularly experiences accruing from our societal life interaction with important others. Consequensely. self concept can be regarded as holding two major maps in the acknowledgment of our experiences and hence forming informations of the same. and the desire to demands while at the same clip avoiding societal disappr oval of egos. Mentions: 10 new wave Gulick. Robert ( 1983 ) . consciouness Starnford encyclopaedia of doctrine. [ 1 ] Van Gulick. Robert ( 1983 ) . [ 2 ] Dimmitt. J. ( 1996 ) .Woman Abuse. Assimilation. and Self-Concept in a Rural Mexican American Community.Latino Journal of Behavioral Sciences [ 3 ] Van Gulick. Robert ( 1983 ) . [ 4 ] Armstrong. David M. A ; Malcolm. Norman ( 1984 ) .Consciousness and Causality: A Argument on the [ 5 ] new wave Gulick. Robert ( 1983 ) . consciouness Stanford encyclopaedia of doctrine. [ 6 ] Armstrong. David M. A ; Malcolm. Norman ( 1984 ) .Consciousness and Causality [ 7 ] Davis. R. C. . Erez. E. ( 1998 ) .Immigrant Populations as Victims: Toward a Multicultural Criminal Justice System.Rhenium [ 8 ] De Vidas. M. ( 1999 ) .Childhood sexual maltreatment and domestic force: A support group for Latino gay work forces and tribades [ 9 ] Armstrong. David M. A ; Malcolm. Norman ( 1984 ) .Consciousness and Causality: A Argument on the