'Should women be allowed to serve in combat positions in the US military?'

'\n\nWomen played an grave constituent in army and armed forces conflicts compensate centuries ago. cargon for and providing help at soldiery hospitals, they were an needful part of the unseeable front which gave the startle aid and substitute to injured soldiers. In the modern world, women acquired even greater role in the armed gains sphere imputable to the impact of womens lib and equality.\n\nAt the map moment, females in the US argon allowed to sue in fall upon positions despite numerous concerns. Western orderliness got used to view that women are light-headed from nature and, different men, were not intentional to defend and besiege with the assailants. Moreover, there subsist moral and mental obstacles for women to avoid armament serve well because of the uncivilised and improper demeanor of male soldiers. still with the pass of while our perception of worldly concern transforms and it happened to the image of women in military service as well.\ n\nIt would be fair to swear that females should cast a right to pick out part in combat when they are physically and mentally ready to do it. Military service is their voluntary decision, so why should they be banned from it? As soon as women have sustain their power and qualification to combat they shall be accepted into service. Surely, they testament be spurned if they did not achieve well in trials or have health issues, provided some of them are ready and add up to take positions in the front. As the sexuality bias has no room in the modern community, military service shall be open to the persons who amass the requirement disregarding of their gender.'